A Different Existence; Principles of Phenomenological Psychopathology

A Different Existence; Principles of Phenomenological Psychopathology Drax A Different Existence YouTube Title A Different Existence Check Out My Channel Forchiptunes Updating Frequently Do You Think The Quality Of This Upload Can Be Better Let Me Know And I Ll Review It Category MusicA Different Existence Principles Of A Different Existence Book Read Reviews From World S Largest Community For Readers Through The Presentation Of The Behavior Of A Single Case, Van Den Read Reviews From World S Largest Community ForA Different Existence Jan Berg Livres Not Retrouvez A Different Existence Et Des Millions De Livres En Stock SurAchetez Neuf Ou D OccasionA Different Existence Principles OfNot Retrouvez A Different Existence Principles Of Phenomenological Psychopathology Et Des Millions De Livres En Stock SurAchetez Neuf Ou D Occasion A Different Existence Principles Of A Different Existence Is Abook By J H Van Den Berg It Is A Light And Engaging Read, An Introduction To Phenomenological Psychopathology, But It Can Be Read By Anyone As It Is Really A Work On The All Important Subject Of Mental Health With Implications Which Anyone Of Us Including The Healthy Person Can Take Away A Different Existence Principles Of A Different Existence Principles Of Phenomenological Psychopathology Download Pdf Issuu Company Logo Close Stories Discover A Different Existence Principles OfAbeBooks A Different Existence Principles Of Phenomenological Psychopathologyby J H Van Den Berg And A Great Selection Of Similar New, Used And Collectible Books Available Now At Great Prices A Different Existence Principles Of Latest News Three Of Our Books Are Finalists In The Foreword Reviews INDIES Book Awards Posted By Lauren Bayer On March ,Gregory Kneidel Wins The John Donne Society Award For Distinguished Publication In Donne StudiesA Different Existence Principles OfFor Those Looking For An Accurate And Concrete Introduction To Phenomenological Psychopathology, This Book Is Probably The Best Way To Go Van Den Berg Is A Pretty Good Phenomenologist, And Has A Very Down To Earth Yet Evokative Descriptive Style That, While L Inventaire Physique Consiste Constater L ExistenceL Inventaire Physique Consiste Constater L Existence Relle Des Diffrents Biens Constituant Le Patrimoine De L Entreprise Il S Agit De Recenser, De Manire Exhaustive, Toutes Les Immobilisations Ainsi Que Les Marchandises, Matires Premires Et Fournitures, Produits Finis Dtenus Par Chaque Unit De L Entreprise Au N Un

Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the A Different Existence; Principles of Phenomenological Psychopathology book, this is one of the most wanted Jan Hendrick Van Den Berg author readers around the world.

[Read] ➪ A Different Existence; Principles of Phenomenological Psychopathology By Jan Hendrick Van Den Berg – Hookupgoldmilf.info
  • Paperback
  • A Different Existence; Principles of Phenomenological Psychopathology
  • Jan Hendrick Van Den Berg
  • 15 November 2019
  • 9780391008250

10 thoughts on “A Different Existence; Principles of Phenomenological Psychopathology

  1. says:

    It is a light and engaging read, an introduction to phenomenological psychopathology, but it can be read by anyone as it is really a work on the all important subject of mental health with implications which anyone of us including the healthy person can take away.The book mostly revolves around the example case of a single psychiatric patient, about whom, the author tells us, I meet him in every one of my patients 4 Overall, instead of laying out a theory the book centres on this central one, and other examples This is in accordance with the phenomenological method itself, which is mostly concerned with direct descriptions rather than with how the world appears on a second thought.Before anything particular is said on the phenomenological method in psychopathology, the patient s story is narrated roughly in the way the patient tells it Van den Berg groups his complaints into four categories really they are all interconnected what is the world the patient lives in what is his bodily health condition what are his relations with other people what are his views on his past and future All this is put forward as the patient says it, without any interpretation We learn, for example, that the patient fears that the houses on the street are about to fall over him that he feels that his heart might stop working that he avoids contact with others whom he perceives mostly as wooden puppets that he hates his past Each psychiatric patient would have complaints relating to all or most of these groups world, body, others, time.Then van den Berg proceeds to suggests what would a standard, non phenomenological approach to understanding these complaints look like Most of us would be inclined to say that the patient s claims are false, that he is simply wrong mistaken about matters of fact about the world or about his body, people around him, his past The buildings are not in reality about to fall down the doctors say his body is in perfect health etc if only he could understand this, and see things in their true light But there is no point in trying to convince the patient that he is wrong about certain matters of fact, says the author Not only because this approach is not going to work in curing the patient, but importantly, because the patient is in an important sense right He is right about his claims He really lives in a world in which houses are about to fall down This world is the reality for the patient There isn t a mental illness which then causes the houses seem unstable it is the unstability of the houses that is the illness itself there is no better way for the patient to describe his mental illness than the way he does it in describing his reality, his world, in which the houses are about to fall down A realization of the reality of the patient s claims is a fundamental trait of the phenomenological approach to psychopathology.Other approaches would instead speak of mechanisms like projection, conversion, transference, or mythicizing, in order to explain the patient s complaints These mechanisms are modelled or less from the physical sciences their aim is to explain, to divide into fundamental elements, and then to understand how one element causes another In psychology, however, such an approach misses something important namely, that one s psychic life is a totality, not a structure of elements Everything is inter connected A recourse to phenomena like projection, etc, is ultimately not much helpful in curing or understanding the patient than it would be to point him to or to produce a diagram of his brain.Take for example projection A standard approach to explaining the patient s complaints about the falling houses would be to say that the patient perhaps feels insecure, and then projects this feeling to the world around him This implies, as van den Berg puts it, a feeling being detached from its original object, then abstracted, and then attached to an objective world out there a world in which the houses in the street are in fact quite stable But this doesn t ring true for van den Berg, not the least because he doesn t believe that feelings can exist in abstract, not being directed at anything Perhaps most importantly, because we humans don t inhabit an objective world at all Our world is fundamentally subjective, a world in which objects have meanings and purpose.Thus, in a wonderful example van den Berg gives, when observing a bottle of wine we ve prepared for the visit of a friend later tonight, what we see is not a green bottle with a white label Of course we do see a green bottle and a while label, etc, but we also see anticipation the bottle feels to us in a certain way Later, when the friend has called to tell us that he actually won t be able to make it tonight, when glancing at the bottle we can t help but feel disappointment Of course, the bottle itself hasn t changed the green glass, the white label, are physically, objectively, the same But for us the bottle has changed It now carries different meanings.Both for the sound person and the psychiatric patient, the world inhabited is not an objective world of physical science The things in the world have meanings, carry certain feelings, etc Everything is interwoven When I stop reading the book I m reading and glance at the bottle and feel disappointed, it won t do to tell me that there is in fact nothing disappointing about the bottle itself Similarly perhaps it won t do to tell the psychiatric patient that there is nothing wrong with the houses themselves He might know all the physical evidence that the buildings are stable It doesn t change the fact that they feel in a certain way in his case, as if they are about to fall down.Van den Berg treats the unconscious in a or less similar manner to projection and the other mechanisms mentioned above While he doesn t deny that often things happen in our life that we are not explicitly conscious of, he isn t very fond of the unconscious used as a mechanism for explanation of the patient s complaints The phenomenological approach denies the existence of separate layers in the person It is interested in the life, in the reality of the patient.Perhaps most interesting and revealing of all points although they are all interwoven I found the relationship van den Berg draws between loneliness and mental illness In fact he calls psychopathology the science of loneliness and isolation In a revealing paragraph, he says The psychiatric patient is alone He has few relationships or perhaps no relationships at all He lives in isolation He feels lonely He may even dread an interview with another person At times, conversation with him is impossible He is somewhat strange sometimes he is enigmatic and he may, on rare occasions, be even unfathomable The variations are endless but the essence is always the same the psychiatric patient stands apart from the rest of the world This is why he has a world of his own in his world, houses can sway forward and flowers can look dull and colorless This is why he also has a special sort of body his heart aches, his legs are weak and powerless His past, too, is different His rearing has failed, and this in turn causes his difficulties with other people difficulties that summarize, as it were, all his other complaints He is alone He is a lonely man Loneliness is the central core of his illness, no matter what his illness may be Thus, loneliness is the nucleus of psychiatry If loneliness did not exist, we could reasonably assume that psychiatric illness could not occur either 105.This reveals what is missing in the theories underlying the four mechanisms mentioned above With these terms, the distinction between healthy and mentally ill person is entirely lost 104 We all project, convert, transfer, and mythicize, but the healthy person will discover in his healthy fellowmen the selfsame, or or less the same, conversions, projections, transferences, and distortions of memory as he himself has, whereas the mentally ill person is alone with his mental mechanisms 105.This point is further elaborated in the discussion of the nature of hallucinations and delusions that follows Van den Berg is not a fan of understanding hallucinations as something gone wrong, or broken, in the connection between the person and reality Hallucinations are the person s reality Hallucinated objects are even real to the patient than everyday objects are for the not lonely And even healthy person subjected to complete isolation hallucinates in a short while Sooner or later, the lonely person will create his own objects 107 Thus, the patient s hallucinations, his unapproachability and the fact that he cannot be understood are all one and the same thing his illness 108 Hallucinations and delusions are not merely the consequence of a condition of loneliness, they are also the condition itself Everything is related to everything else.The book also has other very interesting things to say, for example on the way we perceive time or change but this is not an exhaustive summary as I feel I will have to reread those parts again before being able to summarize them well And as with everything in phenomenology, the ideas are for the most part not the sort of things that you can dissect easily, and put down on paper in A.B.C, or for that matter, summarize very successfully This isn t to say that the book isn t written very clearly the ideas in the book are conveyed mostly in examples, and I also loved the style of writing It is a relatively short read as well, overall I recommend this review is from my blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *